I'm looking to build VBR under instance based license to backup setup above. I have 4 physical servers running Windows 2012 R2 (AD, File Server, MS Dynamic & SQL). I need your support to provide me with the right setup. Building own infrastructure on AWS instead of using the provided repository: any pros and cons (recovery, speed.)? Is there even cheaper option for it? What would be your recommendation for the setup? Should we go for VTL, or a conventional storage would do? Since it's another layer with it's own point of failure, it would probably be not as robust, but I'd like to hear if my thinking/logic is correct. It would be somewhat cheaper: we would be able to use the current license, and the ~8 hour uptime + 4TB disk would be less then $300 / month. In order to make it more secure and robust, we're thinking of moving the setup to the cloud with Veeam Cloud Connect, but the cost seems to be too high for us (>$500 / month for repository + license).Īs far as I can tell, the cheaper way would be to go for, for example, Amazon AWS, with EC2 instance running Veaam Backup Agent, and a 4TB HDD. We also have an offiste backup repository that is nothing but a physical windows server in an apartment running Veeam Agent and with a 4TB HDD, where the backup copies get dumped. We're using Veeam Backu Essentials to backup and replicate our ~50 VMs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |